Constitutional rights prevail over criminal restrictions
The case concerned sections 12 and 15 of the Sexual Offences Act 1995. The court found that the restrictions conflicted with constitutional protections including liberty, expression, privacy and protection against sex discrimination. UNAIDS welcomed the decision as a change that could improve access to justice and health. [1]
Healthcare workers hear the consequences of fear
In a subsequent UNAIDS interview, David described people avoiding calls or treatment because they feared exposure and stigma. Women against Rape director Alexandrina Wong linked hostile healthcare settings with barriers to HIV testing and follow-up care. Her organisation provided counselling and psychosocial support to people facing violence and exclusion. [2]
Community work continues after the ruling
ECADE director Kenita Placide connected the litigation with organising that began in 2015. Wong said: “We now have safety under the law”. She also called for families and churches to recognise people as equals, regardless of sexual orientation or social background. [3]