National procedure did not settle every state rule

The organisation distinguished the national code’s procedural role from state rules governing contracts, wills and powers of attorney. Carlos Ríos Espinosa, its associate disability-rights director, called for prompt state action. The coalition argued for support that respects a person’s will and preferences instead of replacing their decisions. [1]

Later UN scrutiny found gaps

In a report issued on 31 March 2026, the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities said legal capacity was still not fully recognised. It noted that several states retained restrictive provisions despite the 2023 reform. The committee also connected deprivation of legal capacity with institutionalisation and lack of community support.

Mexico described reforms and remaining differences

In observations received in March 2026, Mexico pointed to Supreme Court case law and reforms in Mexico City recognising supported decision-making. It also acknowledged that other states continued to apply incompatible provisions to varying degrees. The national reform had therefore not yet removed all restrictions in state legislation. [3]