Portrayals should reflect ordinary lives
The judgment, written by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, stated: “Visual media must reflect their lived experiences.” It called for accurate portrayals and consultation with disability organisations. The framework addressed both degrading stereotypes and depictions suggesting that disabled people must possess exceptional abilities to deserve respect. [1]
The court left the film certification intact
Malhotra had objected to language and representations of disability in the film. Sony Pictures argued that its message concerned the characters’ strengths and agency. The court declined the requested changes to the film and to the composition of certification bodies, while encouraging relevant expert consultation. [1]
Accessibility measures covered cinema audiences
Earlier that year, the information ministry issued separate cinema-accessibility guidelines covering captions and audio description. The standards set phased deadlines for films and theatres, required consultation with disability organisations, and provided for accessible features during regular screenings. The provisions also addressed staff training and complaints about unavailable access services. [2][3]